Archive

Archive for April 24th, 2009

HIGH COURT TO CONDONE DELAY

April 24th, 2009

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA vide Civil Appeal No.1939 of 2009 with C.A.Nos. 1840-1941 of 2009, which was decided on 27/03/2009 in re: CCEX vs HONGO INDIA (P) LTD. held that we have to see the scheme of the special law here in this case is Central Excise Act. The nature of the remedy provided therein are such that the legislature intended it to be a complete Code by itself which alone should govern the several matters provided by it. If, on an examination of the relevant provisions, it is clear that the provisions of the Limitation Act are necessarily excluded, then the benefits conferred therein cannot be called in aid to supplement the provisions of the Act. In our considered view, that even in a case where the special law does not exclude the provisions of Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act by an express reference, it would nonetheless be open to the Court to examine whether and to what extent, the nature of those provisions or the nature of the subject matter and scheme of the special law exclude their operation. In other words, the applicability of the provisions of the Limitation Act, therefore, to be judged not from the terms of the Limitation Act but by the provisions of the Central Excise Act relating to filing of reference application to the High Court. The scheme of the Central Excise Act, 1944 support the conclusion that the time limit prescribed under Section 35H (1) to make a reference to High Court is absolute and unextendable  by Court under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. It is well settled law that it is the duty of the Court to respect the legislative intent and by giving liberal interpretation, limitation cannot be extended by invoking the provisions of Section 5 of the Act.

In the light of the above discussion, we hold that the High Court has no power to condone the delay in filing the reference application filed by the Commissioner under unamended Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 beyond the prescribed period of 180 days and rightly dismissed the reference on the ground of limitation.

[for full text of the judgement pl. visit http://www.taxesinindia.com and click on the citation taxind_2009_sc_ca_1939]

VENKATRAMAN RAGGHUPATHY, Web admin.
logo_linkedin_78x21

SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS , ,

fml forte 5 ml advair diskus 500 mcg 250 mcg 100 mcg diovan 160 mg 80 mg 40 mg viagra 50 mg