<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>taxesinindia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PETROL PRICING DECONTROLLED</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/26/petrol-pricing-decontrolled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/26/petrol-pricing-decontrolled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PRICING MECHANISM IN INDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DECONTROLLED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FREEDOM TO PRICE FUELS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIL COMPANIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PETRO PRICES]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TO-DAY&#8217;S HOT NEWS IS;- Moving twards a market determined fuel price regime, the Empowered Group of Ministers [EGM] freed the Government from fixing price of petrol and Diesel with a leash on state-run oil marketing companies [OMCs] on future change in diesel prices. Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee said price control had become unbearable for his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/26/petrol-pricing-decontrolled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUPREME COURT ON DISMISSAL OF CASES</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/24/supreme-court-on-dismissal-of-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/24/supreme-court-on-dismissal-of-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest ruling from the Apex Court on the need for deciding cases, which are otherwise to be dismissed for delay in filng, on merits reads as follows:- Courts ought not to dismiss cases on mere technicalities like delay in filing an appeal or a petition unless a malafide intent is apparent on the side [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/24/supreme-court-on-dismissal-of-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GROUND FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY  NOT VISIBLY CLEAR?</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/20/ground-for-condonation-of-delay-not-visibly-clear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/20/ground-for-condonation-of-delay-not-visibly-clear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 10:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CESTAT ORDERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONDONATION OF DELAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECTION 35F]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRBUNAL WEST ZONAL BENCH, MUMBAI APPELLANT: BHARATH PETRLEUM CORPORATION LTD RESPONDENT: CCEX, NASHIK CORAM : HONBLE S/SHRI P.G. CHACKO, MEMBER [JUDICIAL] &#38; S.K. GAULE, MEMBER [TECH.]  FINAL ORDER No. : A/177/2010/EB/C II DATED : 19.05.3020 PER SHRI P.G. CHACKO, MEMBER [J] :- This appeal was filed by M/s. BHARAT [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/20/ground-for-condonation-of-delay-not-visibly-clear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LITIGANT ENTITLED TO KNOW REASONS FOR GRANT OR REJECTION OF HIS PRAYER</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/11/litigant-entitled-to-know-reasons-for-grant-or-rejection-of-his-prayer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/11/litigant-entitled-to-know-reasons-for-grant-or-rejection-of-his-prayer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proper reasning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/11/litigant-entitled-to-know-reasons-for-grant-or-rejection-of-his-prayer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA while remanding the case n re: ASST. COMMR. OF COMMERCIAL TAX DEPT. vs. SHUKLA &#38; BROTHERS in C.A.. No.   .3289 of 2010 on 15.4.2010, held as follows: - QUOTE: The increasing institution of cases in all Courts in India and the resultant burden upon the Courts has invited attention of all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/11/litigant-entitled-to-know-reasons-for-grant-or-rejection-of-his-prayer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MODVAT CREDIT ON CERTAIN GOODS</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/09/modvat-credit-on-certain-goods/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/09/modvat-credit-on-certain-goods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/09/modvat-credit-on-certain-goods/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA while dismissing the appeals filed by MADRAS CEMENTS LTD vs. COMMR. OF C .EX. in Civil Appeal No. 2037 of 2006 with C.A. No.7443 of 2008 held as follows: - QUOTE: -The short point involved is these appeals is whether the Appellant/Assessee is eligible for Modvat credit on certain goods for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/09/modvat-credit-on-certain-goods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MODVAT CREDIT ON CERTAIN GOODS</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/09/modvat-credit-on-certain-goods-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/09/modvat-credit-on-certain-goods-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1944]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEX. RULES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODVAT CREDIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RULE 57Q]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/09/modvat-credit-on-certain-goods/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA while dismissing the appeals filed by MADRAS CEMENTS LTD vs. COMMR. OF C .EX. in Civil Appeal No. 2037 of 2006 with C.A. No.7443 of 2008 held as follows: - QUOTE: -The short point involved is these appeals is whether the Appellant/Assessee is eligible for Modvat credit on certain goods for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/09/modvat-credit-on-certain-goods-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RULE 6(3)(B) OF CENVAT CREDIT RULES, 2004</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/07/rule-63b-of-cenvat-credit-rules-2004/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/07/rule-63b-of-cenvat-credit-rules-2004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HIGH COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CENVAT CREDIT rULE 6(3)(B)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC 11 AC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &#38; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH, while dismssing the appeal filed by the CCEX LUDHIANA vs SANGRUR AGRO LTD. in C.E.A. No.40 of 2007, on 9.2.2010, it was held as follows: - QUOTE: The short question is whether the respndent is liable to pay penalty and interest on the excess amount [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/07/rule-63b-of-cenvat-credit-rules-2004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SORRY FOR THE INTERRUPTION</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/07/sorry-for-the-interruption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/07/sorry-for-the-interruption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/07/sorry-for-the-interruption/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DUE TO CERTAIN CALAMITIES IN MY FAMILY LIFE, I COULD NOT CONCENTRATE ON POSTING IMPORTANT LEGAL NEWS ITEMS FOR THE PAST THREE MONTHS. NOW THAT ALL SUCH WORRIS ARE OVER, I AM BAK WITH FULL ENERGY TO UPDATE THE LEGAL NEWS / JUDGEMENTS etc. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. VENKATRAMAN RAGGHUPATHY, Web admin.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/06/07/sorry-for-the-interruption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>INVOCATION OF DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/24/invocation-of-discretionary-jurisdiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/24/invocation-of-discretionary-jurisdiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HIGH COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isretionary jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palpable injustice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root of the jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultra vires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/24/invocation-of-discretionary-jurisdiction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DELHI H.C. while deciding the writ petition no. 11435 of 2009 on 4.9.2009 in re: BRAHMAPUTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. vs DELHI DEV. AUTHORITY observed as follows: - QUOTE: This cannot be disputed that as to when a discretionary juridiction is to be exercised or refused to be exercised by the High Court, it is to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/24/invocation-of-discretionary-jurisdiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MAKING A REFRENCE TO FULL BENCH</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/24/making-a-refrence-to-full-bench/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/24/making-a-refrence-to-full-bench/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HIGH COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 226]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REFERENCE TO THIRD MEMBER]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DELHI HIGH COURT while deciding the W.P.(C) No.1210/2003 on 20.2.2010 in re: BRIG. V.K. ANAND vs UNION OF INDIA observed as follows: QUOTE: When the two judges decided the writ petition under Article 226, which is in the nature of original proceedings, differed on a question of fact or law, reference to a third judge [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/24/making-a-refrence-to-full-bench/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
