<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>taxesinindia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:33:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>D.D. GANDHI Versus UNION OF INDIA</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/d-d-gandhi-versus-union-of-india/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=d-d-gandhi-versus-union-of-india</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/d-d-gandhi-versus-union-of-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=2480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD S/SHRI Harsha Devani and H.B. Antani, JJ. D.D. GANDHI Versus UNION OF INDIA Special Civil Application No. 11068 of 2009, decided on 1-12-2010 Facts of the case concisely stated are as under: The petitioner gave secret information about evasion of central Excise Duty by M/s. Viral Laminates [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/d-d-gandhi-versus-union-of-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICON INDUSTRIES Versus UNION OF INDIA</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/icon-industries-versus-union-of-india/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=icon-industries-versus-union-of-india</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/icon-industries-versus-union-of-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=2478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI S/SHRI Dipak Misra C.J. and Sanjiv Khanna, J. ICON INDUSTRIES Versus UNION OF INDIA W.P.(C) No. 15926 of 2006, decided on 2-8-2011 The Settlement Commission opined that the units were registered only after the search was conducted and prior to that there was no registration and no returns as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/icon-industries-versus-union-of-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SLOTCO STEEL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/slotco-steel-products-pvt-ltd-versus-union-of-india/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=slotco-steel-products-pvt-ltd-versus-union-of-india</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/slotco-steel-products-pvt-ltd-versus-union-of-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=2476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI S/SHRI Dipak Misra, C.J. and Sanjiv Khanna, J. SLOTCO STEEL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA W.P. (C) No. 5786 of 2011, decided on 11-8-2011 We have heard Mr. Sidharth Luthra learned senior counsel along with Ms. Arundhati Katju learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Himanshu Bajaj and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/slotco-steel-products-pvt-ltd-versus-union-of-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ECO VALLEY FARMS &amp; FOORDS LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/eco-valley-farms-foords-ltd-versus-union-of-india/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=eco-valley-farms-foords-ltd-versus-union-of-india</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/eco-valley-farms-foords-ltd-versus-union-of-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=2474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY S/SHRI J.P. Devadhar and Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. ECO VALLEY FARMS &#038; FOORDS LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA Central Excise Appeals No.3 of 2011, decided on 13-1-2011 [Order].- P.C. : The question raised in this appeal is whether the CESTAT by its order dated 6-12-2010 is justified in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/eco-valley-farms-foords-ltd-versus-union-of-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>N.P. HAROUN RASHEED Versus SPL. DIR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, NEW DELHI</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/n-p-haroun-rasheed-versus-spl-dir-enforcement-directorate-new-delhi/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=n-p-haroun-rasheed-versus-spl-dir-enforcement-directorate-new-delhi</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/n-p-haroun-rasheed-versus-spl-dir-enforcement-directorate-new-delhi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=2472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS S/SHRI S. Nagamuthu, J. N.P. HAROUN RASHEED Versus SPL. DIR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, NEW DELHI Writ Petition (MD) No.6489 of 2008 and M.P. (MD) No. 1 of 2008, decided on 15-11-2010 [Order].- Challenge in this writ petition is to the order of the second respondent, dated 1-5-2008, made [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/n-p-haroun-rasheed-versus-spl-dir-enforcement-directorate-new-delhi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNION OF INDIA Versus HARSH VARDHAN CHAUHAN</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/union-of-india-versus-harsh-vardhan-chauhan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=union-of-india-versus-harsh-vardhan-chauhan</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/union-of-india-versus-harsh-vardhan-chauhan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=2470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI S/SHRI Pradeep Nandrajog and Siddharth Mridul, JJ. UNION OF INDIA Versus HARSH VARDHAN CHAUHAN W.P. (C) No.5013 of 2010, decided on 24-11-2010 [Judgment per : Pradeep Nandrajog, J.].- In the financial year 2004-2005, two companies namely Rajesh Exports Limited (hereinafter referred to as “REL”) and Adani Exports Limited (hereinafter [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/union-of-india-versus-harsh-vardhan-chauhan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., RAIGAD Versus MICRO INKS LTD.</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/commissioner-of-c-ex-raigad-versus-micro-inks-ltd/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=commissioner-of-c-ex-raigad-versus-micro-inks-ltd</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/commissioner-of-c-ex-raigad-versus-micro-inks-ltd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=2468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY S/SHRI J.P. Devadhar and Roshan Dalvi, JJ. COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., RAIGAD Versus MICRO INKS LTD. Writ Petition No. 2195 of 2010, decided on 23-3-2011 The commissioner of Central Excise Raigad is aggrieved by the order dated 4th June 2010 passed by the Joint secretary to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/commissioner-of-c-ex-raigad-versus-micro-inks-ltd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BABOO RAM HARICHAND Versus UNION OF INDIA</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/baboo-ram-harichand-versus-union-of-india/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=baboo-ram-harichand-versus-union-of-india</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/baboo-ram-harichand-versus-union-of-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=2466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD S/SHRI Harsha Devani and Bela Trivedi, JJ. BABOO RAM HARICHAND Versus UNION OF INDIA Special civil Application No.3031 of 2011 decided on 29-3-2011 Assailing the seizure made vide seizure memo and panchnama both dated 7-2-1010, Mr. Joshi learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the seizure is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/baboo-ram-harichand-versus-union-of-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNT PLANTATIONS Limited Versus UNION OF INDIA</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/rnt-plantations-limited-versus-union-of-india/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rnt-plantations-limited-versus-union-of-india</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/rnt-plantations-limited-versus-union-of-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=2464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI S/SHRI Hrishikesh Roy, J. RNT PLANTATIONS Limited Versus UNION OF INDIA Writ Petition (C) No. 9292 of 2004, decided on 15-3-2011 The petitioner-company owns 3 Tea Estates i.e. Lukwah and Khona (in Sivsagar district of Assam) and Dalgaon Tea Estate in Jalpaiguri, west Bengal. The Lukwah Tea Estate of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/rnt-plantations-limited-versus-union-of-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BANGALORE-II Versus GOKALDAS INTIMATE WEAR</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/commissioner-of-c-ex-bangalore-ii-versus-gokaldas-intimate-wear/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=commissioner-of-c-ex-bangalore-ii-versus-gokaldas-intimate-wear</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/commissioner-of-c-ex-bangalore-ii-versus-gokaldas-intimate-wear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/?p=2462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE S/SHRI N. Kumar and Ravi Malimath, JJ. COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BANGALORE-II Versus GOKALDAS INTIMATE WEAR C.E.A. No. 109 of 2009, decided on 11-4-2011 The assesse are the manufacturers of readymade garments. They availed cenvat credit and cleared the finished products on payment of duty. A notification [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2012/02/04/commissioner-of-c-ex-bangalore-ii-versus-gokaldas-intimate-wear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

