<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>taxesinindia &#187; UNDUE HARDSHIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/tag/undue-hardship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:33:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>STAY/DISPENSATION OF PRE-DEPOSIT</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/07/staydispensation-of-pre-deposit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=staydispensation-of-pre-deposit</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/07/staydispensation-of-pre-deposit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 11:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HIGH COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DISPENSATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERROR IN ORDER MANIFEST ON RECORD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRE-DEPOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRIMA FACIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNDUE HARDSHIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/07/staydispensation-of-pre-deposit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI, while deciding on 29.8.09 the Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1793 of 3008 in re: VIRENDER KUMAR YADAV vs UNION OF INDIA, it was observed as follows:- QUOTE: From various judicial pronouncements on this issue, the position which emerges is that the Tribunal while considering any application for waiver of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2010/03/07/staydispensation-of-pre-deposit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>INTERPRETATION IN A MANNER TO BRING HARMONY</title>
		<link>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2009/11/06/interpretation-in-a-manner-to-bring-harmony/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=interpretation-in-a-manner-to-bring-harmony</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2009/11/06/interpretation-in-a-manner-to-bring-harmony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HIGH COURT JUDGEMENTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HARMONY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORDER OF STAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PENDING APPEAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RELATING TO AN APPEAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNDUE HARDSHIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2009/11/06/interpretation-in-a-manner-to-bring-harmony/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA, while deciding the Writ Petition No.261 of 2008 with W.P. Nos. 1161, 230, 1016, 2428 (W) and 4006(W) OF 2008, ON 23.6.09 in re: PROMISING EXPORTS LTD vs U.O.I. it was observed as follows: - QUOTE: It has been noted that Section 35C(2A) directs that the &#8220;Appellate Tribunal&#8221; to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxesinindia.com/blog/2009/11/06/interpretation-in-a-manner-to-bring-harmony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

